Back to advisors

Source

Student reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.

External review archive2

Reviews below are republished from a third-party advisor review platform and reflect the original authors' opinions only. They are not verified by us. Contact us for takedown requests.

Source: Supervisor Review Archive (third-party open dataset)Academic5/5Funding5/5Relations3/5Career5/52018-01

学术水平:对课题把握很准,能紧紧抓住课题的创新性,写文章水平很高,眼界很高 科研经费:经费较为充足,不差钱 师生关系:老师性格比较急,对学生Push较严重 学生前途:文章发的还不错,但是也有一些发的一般的学生

Source: Supervisor Review Archive (third-party open dataset)Academic5/5Funding5/5Relations3/5Career5/52017-08

学术水平:学术水平高,老师本人很有洞察力,但创新度不高 科研经费:很足,尽管化学,但不差钱;组内设备不错,但目前公共设施条件差,导致冬冷夏热 师生关系:查岗频繁,比较push;对学生区别对待,着重Ph.D的培养,组内人太多,硕士看自身能力和个人造化了;硕士得干些杂活,现在组内有了小老板,又配有行政人员,杂活少多了。 学生前途:不准实习,找工作的止步;博士是培养重点,毕业时大多得手握一区文章毕业后大多出国做博后,回国找教职。近年方法学势衰,辉煌时,Ph.D毕业手握5篇一区文章,早期毕业生拿到青千,做到南京大学正教授,近年好文章难发,前景难料,但终不会太差。